Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Let the Reader Finish the Painting

Mona Lisa There is a relationship that develops between the reader and the writer, or more specifically, the reader and the writer's words. How you treat the reader and this relationship is one of the most important decisions you can make as a writer. Do you trust in your own work? In how it will be received and interpreted? Or do you feel that you have to lay out every single detail. Often if you don't trust in your words you'll end up writing dialogue like this: 

  He gently ran his fingers across the marble tabletop. "That's a gorgeous table," he said, happily. 

 What this sort of adverbial description shows is that you don't quite trust the reader to receive the message so you tell them exactly what is happening. But it's important to remember that this is a give and take relationship and that the reader is paying very close attention to what you're writing. So instead you could create the scene this way: 

  He gently ran his fingers across the marble tabletop. "That's a gorgeous table," he said. 

 Only the word happily has been dropped from the scene. But because of that, the reader does the work. They assume that the "gorgeous" statement is made in a positive manner. They know this because he gently ran his fingers across the table. It indicates what his feelings are about the table. As the writer one aspect of your job is to get the reader to do much of the work. It's the perfect relationship that way. Yeah, you might have some heavy lifting to do, but they should be lifting along with you. Or, for that matter, if you're painting a beautiful portrait of a scene with words, let them finish the painting. Don't give them every single detail, slowing down the story. Pick the pertinent details. They will automatically create the rest of the scene. 

  Everyone was gone, but Robert sensed a presence. At the landing he peered around the corner, saw nothing but the kitchen table, the tall, red vase by the window, and a cloth flour bag on the counter.  The De Laval cream separator, with all its bowls and pipes, loomed on the cupboard like a Martian instrument of torture. 

 Notice that this doesn't describe the floor. But you likely pictured it because...well...kitchens have floors. Nor is the colour of the cupboard mentioned. Though you likely filled that little detail in. And by reading about a cloth flour bag on the counter your brain may have been twigged to the fact that this is written in the past. 

 This could have easily been: 

 Everyone was gone, but Robert sensed a presence. At the landing he peered around the corner, saw nothing but the old, tired-looking kitchen table with its four spindly legs, the wooden floor,  the tall, red vase by the dirty window, and a grey and torn cloth flour bag on the green counter. The massive De Laval cream separator, with its three bowls and seven pipes, loomed on the cupboard like a giant and frightening Martian instrument of torture. 

  The reader doesn't need all that extra info. Our job is to get ride of the distractions in the scene. And then we let the reader finish the painting. 
It's their job, really. 

  Art

6 comments:

Kristin Butcher said...

I absolutely agree, Art. I want my readers to personalize my stories to fit them particularly, so I seldom -- for instance -- physically describe my characters unless it is important to the story. I'm actually pretty spare with adjectives and adverbs in general and tend to opt for descriptive nouns and specific verbs instead. I'm a great believer in 'less is more'. The funny thing is that I often get letters/emails from readers telling me how wonderfully I described something, when the truth is -- as you said -- the readers provided the actual description. I simply motivated them.s

Arthur Slade said...

Now if only we could get the reader to write the whole book!

Jack said...

I need to keep more aware of this. Often I use too many words to get my point across. I've read books where this happens and usually give up on them because I feel like the author is implying I'm rather dim and need help figuring out what is going on.

Arthur Slade said...

That's one of our goals, too--not to imply that the reader is dim. ; )

Krista Michelle Breen said...

I love dialogue. I write reams of dialogue and then fill the description in. Perhaps not the best approach, but I do get bored to tears when authors can't pull off authentic teenager dialoge and try to compensate with paragraph after paragraph of loathsome description.

Show me how witty your characters are. Create tension with the things they say.

Arthur Slade said...

Yes, crisp dialogue can really move a story along. I don't need three paragraphs about the table they're sitting at. I just want to hear them talk...